Monday, December 5, 2011

Between Ijtihad and dogmatic

Between Ijtihad and dogmatic

Already we understand, in religion, we must follow what Allah has revealed to His Messenger. All of which, has been completely delivered and explained to our Prophet. There is very little left. So it mandatory for us to obey Allah and His Messenger, and return something to the two disputed.

And we must turn away from what menyelisihi Book of Allah and the Sunnah of His Messenger, even though it came from a mujtahid imam. In the case of religion, there is the issue of religious problems with the law specified that qath'i nash, both tsubut and dalalahnya, there is established by ijma 'ulama, and there are texts that are not defined in tsubut or dalalahnya qath'i, or no texts in the matter, as well as scholars of different opinion.
In the first problem and the second problem, the problem is easy.Everyone must accept and follow, and should not be menyelisihinya, whether he is a cleric or a layman. What if there are no texts in a problem and the scholars disagree? What should a person do? Does he have diligence to determine the legal issue, or ijtihad bertaklid to others? To understand this issue, we adopted the following explanation of ijtihad and taqlid,

The essence of Islam

How could the whole Qur'an is perfect parallel to the human product is full of shortcomings? If these words come out from people who have been upheld upon proof, of course he became heathen: but we memakluminya, due to his stupidity. We preach to people like this so devoted to God, remember the death, resurrection, his encounter with God Ruler of the universe, reckoning, reward and punishment. Then it must believe that the Qur'an is the Word of God (not the creature and not a product of culture), sleaze and contains no flaws, everything is good, religion and righteousness, and otherwise is a falsehood and corrupt.

Thus, for eternity is not acceptable to say when the Qur'an as a product of culture. Remarks such as these misguided misleading.The Qur'an, as I said earlier, is a perfect whole, as the word of God about the jinn who listened to greeting the Qur'an: And they say: "We have really heard a wonderful Qur'an, (a) give directions to the road correct, then we believe in him.
And we will never one as with our Lord.

Islamic Attitudes Against Slavery
Actually, once slavery had spread to all corners of the world / earth, not only in the Islamic era. The Romans, Persians, Babylonians, and Greeks, all recognize slavery. And the leaders of Greece, like Plato and Aristotle were only silenced this action.In fact they have many reasons to enslave a person such as the existence of war, prisoners, kidnapping or for being a thief.

Not only that, they also sell children into their dependents into slavery, even some of them regarded the peasants as a slave.They despise against the slaves, so slaves were hired to handle the dirty jobs and heavy.

And that's why Aristotle regarded the slaves are not eternal life in the hereafter, they are either in Heaven or in Hell, so the slaves are not different from animals. Pharaoh had enslaved the Children of Israel with the most cruel treatment, so the bear he killed the boy and the Children of Israel kept alive their female children.
The Europeans discovered America even when they give the worst attitude towards the natives. This is slavery, because, influence and shape in addition to the teachings of Islam. The example we have just a little new to say of the many brands cruel to the slaves.

People Layman: Between imitation and Ijtihad

Talking about ordinary people, then it can not be separated from one of the problems associated with the problem of imitation. Or how to carry out and looked at religious matters that have not been understood, so it requires a referral to find out their knowledge. Because in general the layman, it mostly does not control the problem.

Sometimes there is too explosive action arguments in the form of conversation, even a physical or other action that may be precisely away from the rules of Shari'a. Perhaps there is a quibble, not every Muslim has the same obligation to convey the truth to each other?

This statement is not wrong. However, let every Muslim must also understand the capabilities and position themselves. Whether as scholars, rulers, Qadi, prosecutors science or as a layman (ordinary people)? Therefore, each has a duty, obligation and authority are different. And every charitable deed must be based on the evidence. So how does one have to take the proof?Especially for a layman; bertaklid or based on science 'limited' who knew?

Defenders Ulama Ulama-Da'wah Salafiyyah Long Until Now
Truly the greatest privilege possessed salafiyah blessed da'wah is the da'wah upright on sunnah is authentic. Da'wah is not based on weak hadiths and false. In such circumstances, the penutut syar'i science also has to know clearly about the terms and condition hadeeth. Including the biggest condition is bersambungnya sanad with the narrators are trustworthy. There are also other requirements, now we do not talk about it and mention it.
Because including the requirement bersambungnya sanad is saheeh hadeeth with the narrators are reliable, then the condition of people who attribute themselves to the salafiyah proselytizing, da'wa is standing upright on a saheeh hadeeth, must have a pedigree da'wa itself. That means he must take manhajnya of the clerical masyayikh and reliable.
The masyayikhnya too, are the scholars who took manhajnya of the masyayikhnya. And so on. People who come later take from people before. A student taking the Shaykh, the son took the father, grandson of the grandfather took, with a sanad which continued with the people who trusted among the scholars of the big and tall.

View of Ahl Al Sunnah Wal Jama'ah Against the Prophet's Companions radi anhum
The virtues of the Companions of the Prophet, the high position and their degree, a matter which has been known well by the Muslims, and is something very important in the din of Islam.

Many verses of the Koran and the Hadith of the Prophet who explained it. L God hath said, which means: Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah and those who were with him are strong against unbelievers, but their fellow filial; You see them bowing and prostrating `seeking the gift of God and keridhaanNya, signsmeraka looks on their faces from the former prostration.
Thus their properties in the Torah and their properties in the Gospel, ie, such as removing plant shoots, then shoot it to make the plant stronger and become great is he and substantially perpendicularly above; plant pleased the planter-growers, because God wanted miff unbelievers (with the power of believers). God promises to those who believe and work righteous deeds among them forgiveness and great reward. "This clause covers all companions of the Prophet of Allaah 'anhum, because they all live together Shalalllahu Prophet' alaihi wa sallam.

No comments:

Post a Comment